A. Lange & S?hne Richard Lange Tourbillon Pour Le M��rite Watch White Gold Boutique Edition
A. Lange & S?hne announced?the A. Lange & S?hne Richard Lange Tourbillon Pour Le M��rite in late 2010 (hands-on here), and at the time, it was pretty much the be-all and end-all timepiece in Lange's history. Sure, their hugely impressive Double Split and?a few other highly complicated pieces were also available, but even just the name of this new release?indicated that it was something even more special. Today, A. Lange & S?hne released?a new version of this remarkable piece, this time in a white gold case, available exclusively at the brand's boutiques around the world �C with no word on it being a limited edition.Getting back to the name of the piece for just one more?moment, you see, A. Lange & S?hne named this watch after Richard Lange, subtly implying the watch's highly scientific nature. Richard was the son of F.A. Lange, the founder of the company, who worked as a?technical director of the manufacture, focusing?on evolving precision watchmaking on the basis of scie

Incoming of a Vintage Seamaster 300 Big 'T"
Hello everyone. Wanted to share my new acquisition. I've been in search of of a mid 60s original Seamaster for quite some time. I did not realize how difficult it is to source an original until finally last week. Hope you enjoy a few of the photos. Next up is sourcing a period correct bracelet.

What is it?
Upon arriving home from a week-long journey, I found myself in possession of a new steel on steel 311.30.42.30.01.002 40th Anniversary Moon Landing timepiece. Apparently -- my wife hasn't found me so objectionable after 30 years of marriage. ;>)In looking at the back of the watch, I've noticed a small mark that's roundish in nature and appears 'frosted' in color. It is so light that I've yet to see it appear in a photo of this model. It is almost imperceptible. It appears just prior to the word THE in the wording, THE FIRST WATCH WORN ON THE MOON. The large photo that I've included is stock Omega. I can't get close enough with my own camera to do justice to the explanation. It's absence in the stock Omega photo may well be just that. It is absent.From the shape, I'm wondering if it isn't the same mark (small photo) that I have seen on the back of a Schumacher model 321.32.44.50.01.001 where it's very obvious?Is this the star that I've read about that doesn't necessarily appea

I have started browsing the Patek forum...
...dipping my toes in....and I am a little scared of your guys... Regards.

Happy Thanksgiving Panerai fans
Hope you have one on you are thankful for!