My Timex Expedition WS4 Watch Article On AskMen.com
Yes, I know, I have reviewed this watch before, but that was the full-length Timex Expedition WS4 watch review, not this special version for the AskMenwatches-dealer audience. You'll get another angle on the watch there. The Expedition WS4 is actually proving to be quite the popular timepiece, no joke. With the cool looks, and reasonable price, it is a strong offering from America's own. Check out my Timex Expedition Ws4 article on AskMenwatches-dealer here.

Photo Report: Recapping The Launch Of The Royal Oak Perpetual Calendar With HODINKEE And Audemars Pi
Last week HODINKEE and Xavier Nolot (CEO of Audemars Piguet North America) hosted a private dinner for members of the company's board of directors, top Audemars Piguet clients, and HODINKEE readers to celebrate the launch of the new Audemars Piguet Perpetual Calendar 26574, which we announced here. Photographer and filmmaker Michael Benson created an astronomical-themed environment for the guests, using black and white imagery to create composite landscapes of the universe. However, the real star of the night was the Perpetual Calendar Royal Oak Reference 26574. 1 OF 22 2 OF 22 3 OF 22 4 OF 22 5 OF 22 6 OF 227 OF 22 8 OF 22 9 OF 22 10 OF 22 11 OF 22 12 OF 2213 OF 22 14 OF 22 15 OF 22 16 OF 22 17 OF 22 18 OF 2219 OF 22 20 OF 22 21 OF 22 22 OF 22

Just arrived !!
Watch + Gift - Wear big for a 38mm- Thickness is alright, not overthick- Comfortable for my 7.5 wrist- Pictures for this watch don't do justice, you have to wear it yourselfSo far i'm a happy camper, can't go wrong on Patek blind purchase.

233 on Green Canvas Strap?
Yes, please! Ordered an OEM green canvas for my boy and I think he is happy.

WG Pepsi
Firstly GMT hand has been corrected on the website and now shows RED. On Basel morning, it showed white on the site which was an error as display models all had Red GMT hand.Secondly - why did they not upgrade it with new movement 3285 and still has 3186 movement? You can't carry basically same watch in WG and SS and WG having older movement on the same catalogue. That is bad on Rolex's part. Movements are not made with WG. Even if they have huge pile of movements, they can still use them on BLNR and LN GMT models and not get wasted. They could have used 3285 on WG Pepsi. It a decision which doesn't need much thinking and you are not even wasting any movements/hands etc as that all can be used on older SS models until they phase out. Why do you think Rolex did this mistake?