Oris Aquis Automatic Black Dial Stainless Steel Men's Watch 745-7666-4054LS Details
Brand:Oris
Series:Aquis
Model:745-7666-4054LS
Gender:Men's
Watch Label:Swiss Made
Movement:Automatic
Engine:Oris 745, base SW 220-1
Power Reserve:38 hours
Dial Type:Analog
Dial Color:Black
Crystal:Scratch Resistant Sapphire
Hands:Silver-tone
Second Markers:Day of the Week around an inner ringMinute Markers around the outer rim
Dial Markers:Stick
Sub Dials:Small Seconds sub-dial at the 9 o'clock position
Luminiscence:Hands and Markers
Band Type:Strap
Band Material:Black Alligator Leather
Band Width:22 mm
Clasp:Deployment with Push Button
Case Size:44 mm
Case Material:Stainless Steel
Case Shape:Round
Case Back:Skeleton
Bezel:Fixed Stainless Steel
Water Resistance:50 meters / 165 feet
Calendar:Date display at the 6 o'clock position
Functions:Date, Hour, Minute, Second
Features:Leather, Stainless Steel
Style:Dress Watches
Warranty:2 Year Jomashop Warranty
UPC Code:845960047180
Internal ID:OR745-7666-4054LS
Item Variation:745 7666 4054LS, 745.7666.4054LS, 74576664054LS
Watches NEWS
TGIF What AP you got on!
Good Day All,It's Friday tomorrow!What AP are you going to ware?I am going to go with Volcano!Thanks,Eric
I've Settled on the 39mm Railmaster . . .
My 1987 Rolex 16013 was my 24/7 watch from 1987 until December 2009 when I placed it in semi-retirement, i.e., special occasions only. Since that time, my Seamaster 300M GMT and 39mm Railmaster have been in every-other-day rotation. Well, although I'll miss the date on the GMT a bit, about a week ago I decided on the Railmaster for everyday wear. My decision was based on the size, weight and simple, elegant style of the Railmaster. Of course, since my favorite niece (15 years old) thinks the GMT is cool, I'll be sure I'm wearing cool when I see her. I've notice, too, that the Railmaster is even more accurate when it's worn everyday as opposed to every other day. Now, this is really cool . . . so I've been told . . .
5575 vs 5975
Which model do you guys prefer and why? The complications on either model aren't exceedingly useful in the modern world so I assume the choice comes down to aesthetics and perceived collectibility. In fact, the legibility of the 5575 is such that it's probably an impractical watch in most circumstances. I'm interested to hear people's thoughts on this and their rationale.
In search of my next piece...
Hi guys. Long time no see, and in seeking your help regarding what I think would like to be my next piece. I think that I have enough steel in my collection and they can be dressed up or dressed down (5711, 5712, RO, ROC, 5167 etc). I have targeted 3 pieces and would like to know what you guys think. In advance, thank you so much for your time and comments. God bless.
I'd like to...
thank everyone I've pestered for info last 2 weeks.Special thanks to Brian who baby sat me at the AP boutique and Wempe.The 5167 came in today and its still as beautiful as I saw it at the AD!I'm not saying this because I'm trying to justify the crazy purchase(my ex would've said.. 'are you crazy??? we could have donated the money to ASPCA).Design wise, I find this watch to be very 'clean' and well balanced.As others had already mentioned the way the light plays on the dial is unreal.. subtle but very unique!I had a difficult time of choosing this watch over the Naut. After looking at the 5711 for a while, there's just too many horizontal elements going on (dial and fin thingys on left side of case) which makes the watch look 'squat'. Its like heavier women should not wear horizontal strips.In any event, anyone know how to remove the pins on the clasp?Is it just a normal push pin?Cut rubber and re attach??Tingoh btw, the box the watch came in is almost worth the price of admission!