Jacob & Co. 47mm - 5 TIME ZONE - STAINLESS STEEL W/ DIAMOND BEZEL & DIAL Details
Ref. No.
:JC - 58DA
Movement
:Quartz
Case Material
:Steel
Bracelet Material
:Leather
Year
:2010
Condition
:0 (unworn)
:New
:With Box
:With Papers
Location
:United States, New York, New York City
Price
:
$ 9,250
Availability
Available immediately
Caliber
Movement
:Quartz
Case
Case Material
:Steel
Case Diameter
:47 mm
Waterproof
:100 m
Glass
:Sapphire Glass
Dial numerals
:Arabic numerals
Bracelet
Bracelet Material
:Leather
Bracelet Color
:Black
Clasp
:Fold clasp, hidden
Buckle Material
:Steel
Functions
:Date, GMT
Others
:Gemstone


Watches NEWS
15202/5711
I know this horse has been beaten to death however please humor me. What are your experienced pros and cons? I really want to get the 15202 but I was wondering if the Patek is superior in craftsmanship.
Audemar Skeleton
.ebay/itm/151898371682...%3AMEBIDX%3AITHello, All,Very new to the watch collecting/appreciation hobbyI do have a nice Rolex two tone blue face sub and love it.Starting to appreciate the AP brandObviously like several of the RO variations What are AP fans thoughts on the skeleton above?Looking for opinions and pointers positive and negative.I think they are sharp but am having a hard time getting specific model #s data etc and have learned experienced folks can point out a lot of things that go right by me.I'm more of a guitar guy and can navigate that world pretty well.Not so much with watches yet.Thanks in advance for any input
Comparison Shots of Different Royal Oaks!!!!
I decided to post some comparison shots of different Royal Oaks as many of you ask frequently how big one watch wears compared to others. Here we have my Royal Oak ref. 15300ST (39mm), the ROO ref. 25721ST (42mm) and the ROO Diver ref. 15703ST(42mm). Regardless of the bad angle of my quick shots, it is very clear that the ROO Diver wears quite larger than the classic ROO because of its flatter bezel and the proportions of the dial.Hope this helps for comparison purposes with so many of you adding APs to your collections.
In praise of the Aquanaut, a review
Hi all,Recently I've been seeing a renewed interest in the Aquanaut so I thought I would post a quick review.I've worn my 5165 on a tropical strap nearly every day at the office for more than three years. During that time it has accumulated the expected scuffs, swirls and minor scratches, particularly on the bezel and clasp. Nothing I can't live with and none that distract from the overall good looks of this reference. The case is a well thought-out design with crown protectors and graceful lugs. It has just the right amount of contrast between polished and brushed surfaces.Because the watch is on the tropical strap it is supremely light. Some might consider its lightweight and thinness as a drawback, but for me it is perfect. The tropical strap merges seamlessly into the case making it look unique to most other watches. Whatever material it is made from, some type of rubber I suspect, it is suitable for all types of weather. If you sweat a lot in the summer this strap is fantastic. Af
Weights for 351, 270 and 312 please?
If any owners could please perish their pieces, I'd really appreciate it. I'm looking to retake the Panerai plunge for a 351. I've owned one before but was recently told the weight on the 351 is very close to the 312. I find that difficult to believe. I'm also extremely partial to the 270.Thanks!EverettSent from my iPhone using Tapatalk