AP Forum
Good Day All,Check this out, there is a AP forum out there;I like this place better..network54/Forum/125468/Take care,Eric

Another polishing question.
I am the happy owner of a Speedmaster Pro purchased in the late 70's. It's had four cleanings in that time, no repairs and NEVER been polished.The patina of the hands and dial face is very nice imo and the lume surprisingly shines brighter than my 1997 Rolex Sub.Now the time has come for a major overhaul and since the case has 30+ years of wear and tear I am tempted to have it cleaned up. My watch man is very established, has both Omega and Rolex accounts with top of the line refinishing machines and assures me metal loss will be microscopic and minimal.Inspite of usually being a rather decisive person I'm on the fence with this one. Resale is not an issue since I plan to pass this timepiece on to my son.Given that I'm pleased with the patina under the crystal and have no desire to replace the dial or hands, will a polish bringing it close to new status look odd ?I've been reading all the pros and cons over the years and would appreciate some personal opinions. Regards, Mark.

Incommming!! 5712r
Hey Guys- Picked up this beauty on Worth Ave in Palm Beach, FL. Alittle Sport, Alittle Dress..

A new Panerai Mare Nostrum Acciaio 42mm
This looks very nice. I dislike the faux patina though. Same movement as the original 1993 too.https://.hodinkee/articles/pa...mm-introducingThanksEverett

Sub 16610 or 116610
I am in the market for a submariner. This is my grail watch. The Submariner has always been my ultimate men's watch. Looks great with surf trunks or a suit. Only issue I'm having is ceramic or classic sub. I love both. I feel if I go with the 16610 I will always regret not getting the most recent release. There's a $1,000 difference between the two. I would get pre-owned due to the price. I'm leaning toward the classic due to the durability of the bezel insert. Scared I may crack the ceramic bezel knocking it into something. Help me decide.