Hands-On: The Breitling Transocean Chronograph 1915 Monopusher
Breitling has released several models commemorating vintage chronographs in the last few months – notably the Transocean Chronograph and the Chronoliner. After our initial coverage of Breitling’s new Transocean Chronograph 1915, many readers were curious of how it would handle in the metal. While updated in comparison to its vintage counterparts from which it draws inspiration, it is a modern offering with bygone flair.? 1 OF 6 The Transocean Chrono wears smaller than expected, but not that small (and I’m not slim-wristed). With a 43 mm diameter and at almost 15 mm thick, it’s a large watch. The lugs hug the wrist rather well, but not enough to completely counteract its presence. Still, it fits fine under a cuff and is surprisingly lighter than expected. 2 OF 6 While the Transocean commemorates Breitling’s first independent chronograph push-piece, I feel that this watch draws quite a bit of inspiration from the Breitling Premie

Omega GMT Co-Axial Seamaster... opinions and pics?
I have always been drawn to the GMT Co-Axial. The build, size, bracelet and the see through back. How many owners out there and what are your impressions? Did you have any issues with the co-axial being accurate or running well? How heavy does it feel on the wrist?Pics too please!

My 312 is gone for a good cause.
It's gone for good this time, out of reach and no longer mine. The last picture And the last thing it did for me is... To fund for something that will satisfy my Panerai :Jni:

Baselworld prediction with nice pitcures.here
rolexpassionreport/25534/...rld-novelties/

116660 vs 16600
I was told by someone that the 16600 is actually more top heavy and floppy on the wrist then the Deep Sea...???Any one who has owned both please enlighten me...