ROO 42mm RGRC wrist shots as promised
I have a couple of good watches but this one I feel so good when I put it on. I usually wear it to special events, dinners etc etc..Also are photos of the hornback strap with rose gold stitching. Sorry for the not so clear photos.

Wristshots of speedy please...
Looking to add a chronograph in my collection, and speedy really caught my attention. I am average wristed, a 40-44mm looks ok to me, if anyone can just post a wristshot, it will be great for me to imagine on how it will look on my wrist since i cant try one on due to theres no omega AD near my area.And one more, is the speedy pro manual wind more desireable compared to other speedy models?Please, enlight me on this.Thanks.Andri

Quick shots of Omega Aqua Terra 2502.50
New acquisition. Saw it while shopping at Costco, spouse said for me to try it on (also tried a Breitling GMT on a brown leather strap), and said if I like it I could have it. After a day, it appears to be a half second fast. Love the dial, no cyclops, and the display back is a first for me. Its a good size too, looks huge even though its just a mm larger than the GMT Master II. Some quick pics with my old 3.2mp Canon Elph:

Nauti by Nature - part 2
With all the craziness of 5711 and 5712. I think we should look at the nautilus again as a series. Each model offers something different that makes it a nice collection. Agree?BTW, Happy Chinese New Year to everyone! Wish you all the best and good health!Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Tudor's Weird GMT Hand??
When Tudor released the new GMT at Basel, I didn't care at first but the watch quickly grew on me.As I started to digest images and videos of the watch one thing stuck that once I saw it, I couldn't unsee it. Now my eyes are drawn to it, in a bad way.The red GMT hand seems to me to be too long. It protrudes past the outer perimeter of the gilt dial. That just seems very wrong to me. Is that normal, does that make sense. I tried to see if early Rolex GMTs did that but couldn't find an example. I know that logically the red GMT hand is to mark the numbers on the bezel so please don't beat me up about that being the reason. It could have easily stayed within the inner gilt circumference and still relate to the bezel. I considered it may be the angle but every single image or video I've seen shows this regardless of angle. (Hopefully that is the situation and then case closed, otherwise...why).Why would Tudor do that. If this goes to production like this, it will likely prevent me from buy