RICHARD MILLE RM 50-02 ACJ
This is no ordinary partnership. The collaboration between Richard Mille and Airbus Corporate Jets has been sealed by a timepiece designed together. The RM 50-02 ACJ was unveiled at the SIHH in Geneva and takes us on a first class flight to the land of luxury watches. Welcome on board the manual wind movement with a tourbillon and split seconds chronograph to measure intermediary time housed in a high-tech case made of a titanium and aluminium alloy to make it sturdy yet lightweight. The porthole design is topped by a ceramic bezel so we can see into the cockpit of an exceptional calibre with titanium components. A twin indicator enables you to wind and use the chronograph. It reviews pressure on the spring to avoid it being too slack or tight. Sit back and enjoy the 70-hour power reserve displayed on a digital scale at 11 o' clock. Price: 1,079,500 CHF (limited edition �C 30 available). Dan Diaconurichardmille

NEW galactic 44mm
Breitling just anounced a new Galactic size. 44mm...It's also in the made to measure section with a white, black and blue dail options. Of course you have the choice of thier full range of straps too.Nice day-dateimage.jpg

SM300 Project
Hi All,First post on this forum, but I wanted to share a project in the works with you guys. I was a little late to the SM300 WatchCo party and as such I unable to obtain a NOS no-date version of the SM300. Therefore, I have sourced the pieces independently. Heres a pic of some of the parts which have come in. Will share more pictures as the watch is assembled by my watchmaker. Cheers,Warren

Lug to Lug Width for new PAM 1392 vs 1312
I am trying to find information on the lug-to-lug distance for both PAM 1392 and PAM 1312. Can't figure out which size I want and I wasn't able to stop by an AD.Here are the specs I have so far:Panerai 1392Diameter = 42.0 mmCase thickness = 13.2 mmLug width = 22.0 mmLug to Lug - ?Panerai 1312Diameter = 44.0 mmCase thickness = 15.6 mmLug width = 24mm Lug to Lug - ?Anyone have the missing info? Many thanks in advance!Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

VERSUS: Submariners Vintage and Modern
Fifth edition of the VERSUS post/picture. What is VERSUS? Well, I thought it would be fun to compare two watches (and only those two watches) and discuss pros/cons by outlining the differences and getting folks' ideas/thoughts/opinions on TRF. We got folks here that have been collecting and studying these things for decades all the way to those who are just starting to venture into the crazy world of Rolex (and everyone in between). Therefore, it would be fun and educational!For this edition, we have a vintage v. modern showdown with the iconic Submariner. A Submariner 5513 and a Submariner 114060. Kind of a grandson/granfather if you will, :)Some obvious things:Modern v. vintageMatte dial v. glossy dialTritium v. LuminovaCase proportionsInsert: metal v. ceramicWhich do you prefer and why?Previous VERSUS:1. VERSUS: Submariner 1680 v. 166102. VERSUS: Rolex Submariner and Sea-Dweller 16610LV and 1266003. VERSUS: Rolex Submariner 16610s4. VERSUS: Sea (Deepsea 116660) to Sky (Explorer 1016