Tissot T-Sport Seastar Chronograph Black Dial Black Rubber Men's Watch T0664171705701 Details
Brand:Tissot
Gender:Men's
Watch Label:Swiss Made
Movement:Quartz
Engine:ETA G10.211
Dial Type:Analog
Dial Color:Black
Crystal:Scratch Resistant Sapphire
Hands:Luminous
Second Markers:Arabic Numeral marks the 12 o'clock positions. Minute Markers around the outer rim
Sub Dials:Three - 60 Second, 30 Minute and 1/10th of a Second
Luminiscence:Hands and Markers
Band Type:Strap
Band Material:Black Rubber
Band Length:7 inches
Band Width:22 mm
Clasp:Tang
Case Size:42 mm
Case Thickness:12.4 mm
Case Material:Stainless Steel
Crown:Screw Down
Case Shape:Round
Case Back:Solid
Bezel:Uni-directional Rotating Stainless Steel with Red
Water Resistance:300 meters / 1000 feet
Calendar:Date display at the 4 o'clock position
Functions:Date, Hour, Minute, Second
Features:Chronograph, Rubber, Stainless Steel
Style:Casual Watches
Warranty:2 Year Jomashop Warranty
Internal ID:TIST0664171705701
Watches NEWS
New AP Arrived
Been waiting for this beauty for a while and she finally came in. Love the weight and the color of the dial. Its great
AP ROO Panda arriving tomorrow.
Some may know that I had a panda 18 months ago but I had a problem with the winding crown and I stated I’d lost confidence in AP. At that time I was a one watch man and generally a Daytona lover so this ‘minor’ problem made my mind up at the time that I was going back to Rolex. Delighted to say that my finances now allow me to indulge in a wider watch collection. I currently have a white gold Daytona and a new Seadweller 43. This is my non Rolex watch. It’s from 2013, just serviced and a 2 year warranty. Please don’t be too hard on me for an overreaction 18 months ago,My WG Daytona:My SD43:My previous AP ROO Panda:
Am I the only one who cannot understand...
Omega?Let me explain...this coincides with numerous posts about the thickness and comfort of the PO.I have a 42mm PO 8500 and have very strong feelings about it.First....it is way too thick. It does not have any satisfactory adjustment for the band and angers me almost every day.It is stunning to look at and the movement is awesome. But I cannot make it fit properly and comfortably.Taking it on and off constantly and/or not wearing it because of this is maddening. In fact I have barely worn it over the year I've owned it because of this.So what do I do? The Rolex Sub C or Datejust ii fit beautifully. However, the PO has essentially become a joke in terms of resale. It appears the only realistic option without opening the wallet and take a huge loss is to buy a 20 year old Explorer II. Omega is so close to catching Rolex in terms of movements and design....but without comfor what do you have?Just my 2 cents.
Nautilus too big?
I am on the search for a Patek, either a Nautilus or an Aquanaut.I'm considering the 5712, 5726, or the 5990 from the Nautilus range, and the 5164 from the Aquanaut range.I have small wrists (6.5) and although I am ok wearing a big watch when 'big' suits it (I.e. An AP Diver) I'm not keen on watches that are designed to 'wear normally' looking too big for a wrist.Having looked at lots of pictures, the 5726 seems to wear quite big, bigger than the 5712, although this also seems to wear bigger than the Aquanaut.The 5990 is a little different as it looks like it's designed to wear bigger and looks a bit more rugged by design, although I could be wrong.I hope I've made sense, but given that I may have to buy blind due to limited availability to try on, if any of you guys have a view, it would be most appreciated.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yachtmaster II
Only recently have I been looking to the Yachtmaster II. Not that I own a yacht or anything, but this highly complicated Rolex and its looks drew my attention more and more. Before I jump to any hasty conclusions I was wondering what the forum thinks of this model, and more specifically about the first and second iteration. Can't wait to read your comments. Thanks.