PO Liquid Metal
I thought the Rolex GMT IIC was the watch I was going to buy next, but after seeing the Omega PO Liquid Metal, no contest. I will try to buy a LNIB or BNIB or wait till the new POs come out in June.

Just another stainless steel chrono?! But this time...
really really rare! Something special that keeps a low profile...something what you can wear whereever whenevere�� Enough descreet if you meet clients or potential clients.For sure the 5711 was the trigger for my insight that high-end watches could be in ordinary steel too. First for a considerable time I lust for the regularly 5950 with the silvery white opaline dial. But there were doubts, because I am a sucker for dark dials. Then at Baselworld 2015 a limited black dial version was luckily introduced.What could be more descreet than a ordinary stainless steel chrono with dark dial?A grand complication in steel with black dial as slim as possible based on a extra slim movement is...UnderstatedDescreetJust beautifulI thought this will be my exit watch if I am able to get one, but it's not! It's the entry to watch heaven...I hope you enjoy the pictures.

the much discussed Patek 5524 aka Pilot watch
very different opinions on this oneprobably the most discussed watch in Base this yearYou had a few days to think about it �� how do you feel now ?

Finally decided - here's the result....
Thanks, many thanks to you guys that have given me incentive I hope this piece would be a special one to cherish.At first, I was appalled with cost and the simplicity -- also that it sports a simple and non inhouse movmt, present also in the Speedy pre moon.I had to be schooled and now I realized that, sometimes, less is more . Well, I had to switch several pieces, but I come to a conclusion that one Lamborghini is better than a dozen Beetles..... although I loved my Beetles ....And if you allow me to say , la semplicit�� �� l'ultima forma della sofisticazione. So, few pic's for your considerationthanks again!

16753
Hi everyone .. As many of you know, I am a huge fan of the Rolex Datejust and know an awful lot about them since I own so many of them in different configurations. That being said, I know very little about the Rolex GMT Master, and I am hoping a GMT expert can help me out. I have the chance to buy a 16753 GMT Master which is all original right down to the factory nipple dial. Being that I don't know much about this watch, and being that I am able to find very little information about this reference, I was wondering if someone with knowledge could weigh in on whether or not buying a 16753 would be a better choice over buying a 16713. I want to add a vintage two tone GMT to my Rolex collection, but knowing very little about the GMT scares me a bit because I don't want to make a mistake and buy something that could be problematic in the future as far as service goes. I'm also curious if this is a watch that could increase in value over time. I will be greatful to anyone with and understa