My 15400 - Still mesmerizing
Despite some recent scratches, competition from my newer watches, my Royal Oak 15400 holds up very well, still mesmerizing, still among my favorite in the collection. Simple, classic, elegant, sparkles. Sheer beauty. Don't agree? See for yourself. One of my best 15400 shots ever. Have a great weekend!

Moonphase Foot Print.
On most models, a close-up view of the Moonphase disc reveals the iconic footprint left by Neil Armstrong.That's from the Omega website. Does that mean you don't always get a foot print on the moon disc of your moonphase?

Omega seamster vs sub
I have to say I did love my no date sub before flipping for a Daytona . But this omega I have enjoyed more than I did the sub.

My first 1950: 320 !!!!
After hours, and hours on this forum -and others - reading about the different options for a GMT in the Panerai family, I finally decided to get the 320. I know it is not a full 24-hour GMT, but I like it much better than the PAM 88 for several reasons:- 1950's case.- In House movement.- Cleaner dial.- Hide-away GMT hand while not traveling.- And the most important one: Ability to change the LOCAL time in 1 hour increments without having to stop the movement.I would have been happy with the 88 if I had been able to move the local hour without stoping the movement, but in the 88, it is the GMT hand that moves in 1-hour clicks without hacking, which for me, didn't make much sense while traveling.I just got it today, BNIB, in all its glory. It is a hefty watch. After trying it at a local dealer earlier in the week, I was a little concerned about it being a little top heavy, and a little larger than I am used to (my daily watch is a 42mm Rolex Explorer II). But after I put it on,

baselworld: bluesunburst dial submariner
Untitled.jpgstumble upon this.