Concord Watches Crystale 0309932 Men's Quartz Watch
The Concord Crystale 0309932 men Quartz Watch white gold, watches, Concord Crystale, two hand men, case, up to 30 m (100 feet) water, Silver dial, engraved Guilloche dial Center, Quartz dial movement, bezel of diamond, hands of your money, movement made in Switzerland, leather strap band

Hands-On: The 1950s Audemars Piguet Perpetual Calendar Reference 5516 For Sale At Christie's Nex
I don't know how many times I've admitted this, but I dream of being a vintage Audemars Piguet collector. The watches are so rare, so beautiful, so special, and until recently, completely under the radar. Now they are getting a little more attention – and a great triple calendar chronograph just sold for serious money at Christie's Geneva – but that doesn't mean the world at large has taken notice. And that is why I am writing this article today. A truly world-class watch is coming up for sale next week, and I want to make sure the collecting world at large takes note. It's an Audemars Piguet, from the 1950s, with a full perpetual calendar, two-tone dial, and leap year indicator. It is one of nine ever made, and it just might be the best watch for sale this season. 1 OF 6 Reference 5516 was made in nine examples, six of which feature the moonphase at 6 o'clock. What makes the 5516 so special? First, the rarity. The watch was made i

Stainless or Ceramic Diver - if you could only have one!
Hi All,I'm in a bit of a predicament and would appreciate your thoughts!I've managed to save for an AP and tried on a stainless diver a few weeks back - fell in love. They didn't have a ceramic version in stock but it has really caught my eye on the forums recently; I actually think it's an even better looking watch. I see that the majority of people on here seem to agree, from the results of a recent poll.Whilst my bank accont may be able to stretch to the ceramic, I'm certainly not going to be able to afford both anytime soon. Whilst my heart is telling me to go for the ceramic, my head is telling me that the stainless will be more 'versatile' - by that I mean I think it would look OK both casual and relatively formal (don't know about the rubber band but with a steel bracelet). I can't see the ceramic ever looking good with a suit and I can imagine it being purely more of a weekend watch.My question would be: even if you prefer the ceramic, would you go for the stainless if you coul

patek.com/owners
FYIOpening Thursday, November 15, 2012 in 81 days and 10:19:38You can go there now and register so that you will recieve an email when it officially opens.Good way to subscribe to their newsletter as well.

First purchase help
Hey everyone, first off I want to thank all of you for the enormous amount of knowledge I've acquired over the last couple of weeks being part of the community. I plan to purchase my first Rolex in 6-9 months. I want to be absolutely sure I pick a watch that I love and know it is the right decision. I am in between a black Sub with date and Yachtmaster with rhodium dial.My thoughts on the two are as follows:Sub: can't go wrong with it and is abolsutey timeless and classic. I see myself getting one disregard if it is my first purchase or not.Yachtmaster: still timeless and gorgeous, but also has the interesting appeal because you don't see those everyday.I've always said I wanted a sub (even when I was in college), but then saw the Yachtmaster and thought oh wow that's what I want. Now I am torn in between the two.Would love to hear everyone's pros and cons and what their ultimate decision would be!Thanks!