Speedmaster 3570.50.00 bracelet question
I have a Speedmaster 3570.50.00 bracelet question. I noticed some models come with screws to adjust bracelet and also near the lugs are one screw on each side. Others use pins. Is this a running change or only on other ref: Speedys?ThanksDCG

5235g
While I was looking at 5524g, ADs are v keen to buy my 5235g at slight premium over the current MSRP (10%+) as there are immediate buyer waiting who don't mind mint preown at premium.I find that interesting since I read 5235g is a dead duck similar to 5960/1a.I not selling mine. Just something I find interesting n to share. HAGWE ahead!.. jen

Help needed 5712 SS or WG?
Hi everyone,Like you all know I have ordered the 5712 in SS, but today my grey dealer told me that he has just received the 5712 in White Gold, it is from 2012, he will send it to Patek Philippe to have it slightly polished and to change the bracelet.The white gold would cost me 400 euros more than the SS.For me the plus of the SS is the bracelet, I prefer metal bracelets to leather, and the beautiful blue dial.The plus of the White gold is that it's gold, the grey dial is also great and it would cost me basically 10.500 euros less than retail price, whereas on the SS version I would save Seeing that I will be living in one year in Thailand maybe the metal bracelet is the better choice, honestly I prefer the SS version because of the metal bracelet, but maybe it is more reasonable to get the gold version for this price?Knowing that I won't be able to buy another Nautilus, so the one I buy will be the only one, maybe will be able to get later an Aquanaut but 2 Nautilus is just impossibl

Thoughts on 312?
I liked this one from the word go but began to prefer the 'dirty dial' 359. I also took a real liking to the 1312 but am finding myself less and less keen on the blue second hand and the 'Automatic' on the dial. Now I'm seriously swinging back to the 312. I had another look-see on Friday night........

372 v 6152/1
Jake's blog has a great photo comparison between the 6152/1 v. PAM372.Photo by Ben Jones