IWC Aquatimer Deep Two St/St NEU incl MWST mit Box + Papieren Details
Ref. No.
:IW354703
Code
:300.463
Movement
:Automatic
Case Material
:Steel
Bracelet Material
:Steel
Condition
:0 (unworn)
:New
:With Box
:With Papers
Location
:Germany, Stuttgart
Price
:
11,150 (= $ 13,866)
Availability
On request
Caliber
Movement
:Automatic
Movement/Caliber
:30110
Power Reserve (h)
:42 h
No. of Jewels
:21
Case
Case Material
:Steel
Case Diameter
:46 mm
Thickness
:15.5 mm
Waterproof
:100 m
Glass
:Sapphire Glass
Dial
:Black
Bracelet
Bracelet Material
:Steel
Bracelet Color
:Steel
Clasp
:Double-fold clasp
Buckle Material
:Steel
Functions
:Date
Others
:Center Seconds, Luminescent Hands, Screw-Down Crown, Screw-Down Push-Buttons

Watches NEWS
Piaget Altiplano Chronograph Watch Sets New Record For Slimness
For SIHH 2015, Piaget will unveil a new ultra-thin flyback chronograph, further helping them to round out their range of "world's thinnest" watches. The Piaget Altiplano Chronograph is not only very beautiful, but it finally adds another chronograph-based model to Piaget's slim men's collection. Until now, if you wanted a Piaget Chronograph you needed to get a Polo Chronograph or a Gouverner Chronograph?�C two decidedly niche designs, without as much mainstream appeal as something more classic, such as this. With the new Altiplano Chronograph, Piaget is able to combine the elegance of their famous dress watch with the appeal of a sporty chronograph �C all in a very slim package.Piaget claims to make "double records" with the Altiplano Chronograph. First is the world's thinnest (manually wound) mechanical flyback chronograph movement, with the in-house made Piaget caliber 883P that is just 4.65mm thick. Second is the world's thinnest flyback chronograph movement based watch case, as the P
PPC comparison - 5970J vs 3971J
I was able to compare the 5970P vs 3971J first series recently.According to Sotheby's auction notes, only 9 known 3971J first series are known to exist, with the sapphire snap-on caseback.I know the forum loves the 5970P. Would anyone here pick the 3971J first series amongst the two?They have the same movement inside, but with different metal and case size, from a different time period in Patek history.Please excuse the typo in the title which I don't know if I can edit, as it should read:PCC comparison - 5970P vs 3971J
Does anyone have the DJ41 with slate dial and green Romans on jubilee bracelet?
I had the DJ2 on oyster and flipped it, but having feelings for this one. Thoughts?
14060 vs 14060m
Hey everybody. I'm well on my way in my quest to get my Sub No-Date (1/3 the way there to be exact ) And I came accross something that I just couldnt find anywhere. I know they had non cosc 14060's and 14060M's but what is the difference between them. I thought this would have been discussed on here but I couldnt find it. There is probably some difference in the movement or something but I just need someone to enlighten me on the details. Also, based on whatever the diferences are would it be worth it to add the extra cash to get the M or just get the older model. Thanks in advance for your insight!
Potentially dumb questions about the Datejust 41
Hey everyone, 1st off, I just recently joined this forum and I'm impressed with the caliber of decorum/courtesy/helpfulness here. Who am I? Basically a kid in his mid-40's who has been a long-time Submariner fanatic. My question is kinda odd so please bear with me... I never took a liking to the DJ until the new SS DJ 41 debuted at Basel last year. Since then it's been on my drool list; it seems my taste is evolving, either that or I'm just finally getting old (ha!). The thing holding me back is whether or not it's wearable with really casual outfits: T-shirt, jeans or shorts. I'm talking REALLY casual, I never - and I mean never dress up. I rarely wear collared shirts or polos. Any feedback would be appreciated. That damn blue dial haunts my dreams. If I may throw in a second question, jubillee vs oyster bracelet? Once again, I'm worried the jubilee might bee too dressy with super casual wear, but I could be wrong. I know all of this is subjective, but please indulge me, thanks.