Glashutte Pano Edition Panomaticchrono XL 95-01-31-24-05 Round Brown Cow Leather Strap Watch Details
Automatic Movement (21 Jewel) with Smooth Sweeping Seconds Hand Solid 316 Stainless Steel with High quality plated Rose Gold Case High quality genuine Leather Strap Mineral crystal scratch durable glass face Water-Resistant Man Size: 42 mm.
Brand Name:Glashutte
Series:Pano Edition Panomaticchrono
Model Number:XL 95-01-31-24-05
Gender:Midsize Watches
Movement:Automatic
Case Material:Rose Gold with Stainless Steel
Case Size:42mm
Bezel Material:Stainless Steel with Rose Gold
Bracelet Material:Cow Leather
Bracelet Color:Brown
Dial Color:White
Dial Type:Arabic numerals
Clasp:Buckle
Crystal Material:Mineral
Watch Shape:Round
Water Resistant Depth:100 Meters / 330 Feet
Watches NEWS
Difference between 15300BA and 15300OR
I wonder about the difference between 15300BA and 15300OR, both being the same size and in red gold? I notice that the OR version is valued higher by Chrono24 (about $2000 difference)(15300BA.OO.D088CR.01 and 15300OR.OO.D088CR.01)
Royal Oak RG Jumbo vs Daytona Platy
Curiosity what members would choose, I think they both are classics and uniquely special with the splash of color they provide, given a choice which would you choose?I figured the AP sub forum would get the most balanced response as (i think its safe to say) we all know what a Daytona is, but i think its a cultivated appreciation that brings us to the Jumbo. Royal Oak Extra thin rose gold 15202OR, 40th Anniversary!
Opinion for a first time AP buyer
Hey guys, In the upcoming couple of months I have decided that I am going to buy myself a royal oak. I am torn between a two models.The 41 MM Rose gold Chronograph on a bracelet or the 42 MM Rose Gold rubberclad. The salesperson at the boutique in NYC told me that they are going to be updating the ROO 42 mm for 2014 (In house movement to replace JLC specifically on that watch). I am unsure if they are going to do anything aesthetically. Which would you go for first?
Back to the Planet Ocean, except this time it's Liquidmetal
For 4 years up until last year I happily wore the previous version Planet Ocean on my wrist. It was a great watch, a design I admired, a watch I assumed would be my grail when it first came out in 2005. To me it had everything, seamaster history, a great design, quality finish and was comfortable to wear. In tribute here it isThen for some reason Rolex consumed the WIS in me and I went on to own and flip every version of the Submariner- ND, SD, date and the Sub C. After buying the Explorer 2 (which I confess to being my favourite watch) the Sub C just wasn't getting any wrist time. The Sub C is far too nice a watch not to be worn and there was no way I could afford to have an object of such value sit in a box, so I decided to flip it. Once I mad e that decision my mind turned immediately to the Planet Ocean. No other watch was in the picture. I went to the Omega dealor and tried on the new 8500 coax PO however I realised that I wouldn't be able to live with the thickness of it so my th
Quandary
I am in a bit of a quandary on what to do about a potential watch swap. I know this is not the vintage side put I would like to field for a opinions over here because I am not typically a vintage watch guy.Several years ago my father whom is still around gave his late 70's Submariner 5513 to my brother who has since passed. The watch went to my young niece who has no interest in it other than it was her dads and she knows I'm nuts about it.I now have the opportunity to put it into my collection. It should be a for a fair price is all original has box and papers with a very certain history. Now the question. What are your thoughts on selling my 14060M no box and papers to partially fund it? I generally don't like to fund a watch with a watch but i really don't need or desire to have two such similar watches. My current collection is the 14060M, 92 GMT Master 2 Pepsi, Ceramic Daytona, Explorer 39, and Speedmaster Pro. So I do have modern pieces and transitional. I have never owned a plas