Zodiac Super Sea Wolf 68 Review
When last we reviewed a Zodiac watch, it was of the highly anticipated Sea Wolf 53. With this watch, Zodiac brought back a diving legend; a watch with a true cult following, historical gravity and style to spare. And they did it right. It wasn't a grotesque, over inflated, dolled up version of a classic, but rather a modernized version of the original that kept all the right aesthetic cues while giving it a beefier, but still very modest 39mm case (up from the original 35mm), and a water resistance of 200m, letting you use the watch as originally intended.Continuing their revival of heritage models, Zodiac followed up the Sea Wolf 53 with another model from the same family, the Super Sea Wolf 68. Bigger, bolder and meant to dive deeper, the original Super Sea Wolf 750 was one of those late 60's and 70's barrel shaped divers that was racing for the bottom, so to speak. With a water resistance of 750m and a locking bezel mechanism, it was a functional tool watch. The 750's are actually m

Ap 26400
Hello RFersI have a few questions to 26400 owners before i pull the trigger. I work my way down so ill end up with a diver or 42mm ROO down the line at some point so i thought why not get get a 44mm first. Personally looking for either the steel or carbon version.If someone owns the Ceramic, RG or even platinum versions feel free to answer.1) Is the watch uncomfortable for everyday use i am talking about wearing it as soon as you get up from bed and taking it off before you sleep.2)I have a 7.5 inch wrist and i found it that the watch surprisingly fits well on smaller wrists such as 6.5 inch wrists.3)If you had the choice of getting the carbon version or a steel version which one would you get and why (color of the dial, contrast sub dials etc)4)The watch is 44mm but does it really wear like a 47mm? Ive tried it once but it was close to a month ago so i don't exactly remember.5)Finally is the watch top heavy again steel vs carbon and does the strap distribute and balance the weight nic

I regret have taken my Moonwatch...and now!
I regret have taken my Moonwatch? And now? Should I trade it for another watch or should I whait and hope to change my mind ?

Ref. number bracelet
Does the bracelet of this seamaster (pic form another thread):fits on the Co-axial seamaster:????If so, can someone tell me the ref.number of the bracelet.

Omega gmt and Rolex Sub.
For 13 years I've worn a TT sub. Before that I had a GMT II. This week I added to my one watch collection with an Omega GMT. Only time will tell if it holds up, but here are my initial thoughts.Sword hands and oversized number markers: As elegant as the mercedes hands are these are so incredibly visible and the lume on this face is the as good as it gets. I think Rolex are trying to improve on lowlight visibility with the new maxi dial. The markers are painted directly onto the face, but I don't mind that at, all as it suites the overall design very well. Personally, I like the more subtle GMT hand over the Rolex.Dial: Semi gloss with a wave pattern. Not as nice as the Rolex deep gloss dial, but pleasant never-the-less.Caliber: I hear very good things about the Omega 1120, but I'll be surprised if it matches the consistency of the 3135. In the three days I've had it, it has gained three seconds and then lost them again. So far, so good.Bracelet: The Speedy bracelet is very solid. No ho