Playing with my Camera and my ROO
Just a few shots of my ROO 25721ST. Please excuse the big scratches on the bezel but this is almost a daily wearer and I enjoy the hell out of it. IMHO watches are meant to be worn and enjoyed. While I am extremely careful with my watches, sometimes nicks and scratches are unavoidable.

Help with vintage Omega Constellation please?
Hello all,I'm a Rolex guy generally, but just inherited the pictured gold Omega from my grandfather, who apparently bought it in the UK in the 1940s or 1950s. It works but needs a service. Can anyone tell me any information about year of manufacture and current price please (for insurance).Much obliged,James

Tried On An Omega SMP Chrono Diver Today.
WOW!THIS watch is just gorgeous!Boy, did it smile back at me!I was very close at buying it on the spot, but will wait until I see the DSSD in person.Here are some pics.What do you think, guys and gals? Does it look good on me?I just LOVE the domed sapphire crystal. And it's only AR coated on the INNER side! I also adore the swords hands and the Tricompax arrangement (3, 6 and 9) arrangement of the sub dials and the unobtrusive date at 6. The case profile is gorgeous, too!Very handsome watch, indeed!

Once upon a time in Geneva ...
We were in PP Manufactures, I saw a poster of a wonderful Patek (which was the first time I saw it). My AD who was with me just smiled (I love that kind of smiles) and he told me: Khalid, do you like this piece??!!!. What the ****?!!. Are you serious??!!!. This is really a piece of art!!. Then he surprised me with saying: I've this piece with me, it just arrived!!!!!!. That moment, I wished I ..... (donno about my feelings that moment)!!!!.However, I just got it today. And I should say that Patek Philippe did a wonderful job with this UNIQUE PIECE (its not published anywhere)!!!.So Guys guess what is it?????!!!!.Lets play!!!.Ps. Salih ... Pls keep away!!!. :-))

Nautilus vs Sub
I just recieved a PM requesting whether the 5711 possibly wore larger than a 116618 considering the fixed lugs on the Nautilus might be longer.They requested some wrist shots to determine the difference.The Nautilus actually wears a lot smaller than your 116618. I have a 16610LV and if anything the lugs are just a bit longer on the Sub than the Nautilus.The big difference however will be in the thickness of the watch. The 5711 is extremely thin when comparted to the 16610, and it will be even more so when compared to your 116618. The movement on the 5711 is only 3.3 mm thick and the case reflects this.So much so, that one should really check it out in person. I would consider the 5711 to be a very elegant sports watch, that may or may not appeal to some people. Most Patek ADs will have some form of Nautilus on hand, unfortunately not all will have a 5711 on hand. The case diameter and lug size will be the same for all versions, however the major diffference between the 5711 and other