Review: Mutewatch
To be honest, I don't usually wear a digital watch.? I find the classic feel and analog dial of a mechanical watch to be far more rewarding and equally easy to use.? Digitals are usually reserved for more strenuous activities that require a more rugged timepiece.? That's when I pull out my trusty G-Shock GX-56.? When I first heard about the Mutewatch however, it changed my expectations for a digital watch.? LED numbers, touch interface, one flowing piece, vibration alerts��this is interesting.? Today, having spent some time with the Mutewatch, I can safely say that it is truly unique and may be the start of a whole new category of watches.The Mutewatch case is one flowing piece of rubber.? There is no separate band, really no seams to speak of, and its screen is hidden under a translucent piece of rubber.? When the screen isn't active, it's invisible.? The time is only displayed on command, through a simple tap on the flat "screen" or a flick of your wrist.youtu.be/Pyk5Pc6x2WEFunctions

Omega desk clock
Found this in a vintage store near my home.. Anyone have any information about it?

Omega Speedy Pro goes to work this time !!!
Hey guys I always give too much attention to my amazing Rolex's but thought I would dedicate a thread to another fav watch of mine the Omega Speedmaster which is a lovely looking watch and looks very much at home in the sky.I know its a Rolex forum but thought you might like to see the Speedy pro at work...Have a great weekend guys..

Need to quit Rolex for awhile....
...because i just got this...:)with the limited run of 315sc..

Sub vs Sub date opinion turns into ramble..
I was trying to decide whether to get a Sub or Sub Date and have seen SO many debates on here I thought I'd share my thoughts (for right or wrong. And I know, it's already been done to death..*yawn*)As far as I can tell it all comes down to these two things:Do you want a date function or not?And do you prefer an older model or new?That's it. There's no other arguments to be had and here are a few things that lead me to this conclusion.Firstly, the issue of the date function making it not a ��classic' Rolex.From what I've been able to read the date was introduced in 1969 on the 1680 meaning the Sub has had the date for 49 years (only 16 years less than the Sub has been around.)How many years does a feature have to be around before it's accepted as a classic?Secondly, the dial is more balanced/symmetrical without the date.True but again isn't this a matter of preference?It's a design change to add functionality, not just popped in there to mess up the balance.The date window doesn't make