Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Diamond Chronograph 18 kt White Gold Men's Watch 26067BC.ZZ.D002CR.01 Details
Brand:Audemars Piguet
Series:Royal Oak
Model:26067BC.ZZ.D002CR.01
Gender:Men's
Watch Label:Swiss Made
Movement:Automatic
Engine:AP caliber 2326/2840
Power Reserve:38 hours
Dial Type:Analog
Dial Color:Diamond pave
Crystal:Scratch Resistant Sapphire
Hands:Luminous
Second Markers:Minute Markers around the outer rim
Dial Markers:Stick
Sub Dials:Three - 60 Second, 30 Minute and 12 Hour
Luminiscence:Hands and Markers
Band Type:Strap
Band Material:Black Crocodile Leather
Clasp:Deployment with Push Button
Case Size:44 mm
Case Thickness:14 mm
Case Material:18 kt White Gold
Crown:Screw Down
Case Shape:Octagon
Case Back:Solid
Bezel:Fixed bezel set with diamonds
Water Resistance:20 meters / 60 feet
Calendar:Date display appears at the 3 o'clock position
Functions:Chronograph, Date, Hour, Minute, Second
Features:Chronograph, Diamond, Gold, Leather
Style:Luxury Watches
Warranty:2 Year Jomashop Warranty
Internal ID:AP26067BCZZD002CR01
Item Variation:26067BC ZZ D002CR 01, 26067BC-ZZ-D002CR-01, 26067BCZZD002CR01
Watches NEWS
Ap 15300 or Daytona steel black dial
Hi sir,Pls help me to decide, I have a Daytona black dial and I'm itching to get an ap , should I sell my daytona and change it to ap 15300 white dial...?Thanks
PROPER INTRO WITH PICS - of some my OMEGA faves
Greetings Gents: I have collected since 1995, and though am currently in the Netherlands (as a result of my dual Citizenship I frequently travel back to the US) - I have gone through many phases, but mainly Omega and Rolex, as well as various 1950s-80s historically significant divers. Some obscure divers as well from: ZRC Etanche Grands Fonds ca. 1960 (6 o'clock crown & Nr. NOS), Aquastar ca. 1962 (Deepstar GEN 1: VJ 23 MINT, GEN 1 Aquastar Benthos 500 Nr. MINT) Aquastar Regatta NEWPORT ca. 1980 (Lemania mov't, TRUE NOS), LIP Nautic - Militar 1940s (MUSEUM QUALITY on original leather band, incredible speciman) LIP Nautic Ski ca. 1965 (electric R 184, dual crown, compressor, MINT), EPSA compressor cased watches of various types, Alsta watches, yep the Jaws movie watches etc... and even transitional Heuer-Tag Heuer ca. 1985 ref 510.501 PVD Chronographs with Lemania's celebrated 5100 (Nr. MINT), ZENITH Defy Gauss ca. 1971 ( MINT, 1/2000, screw-down crown, 200m WR, exact spec to Role
Looking for Advice: 5165 or 5167
Hello all,I've decided to go for an Aquanaut. However I'm trying to decide between the elusive 5165 & the 5167. I know a good number of folks on this forum have the 5167 and swear by them, but hoping to get some comments from folks who have owned or at least seen a 5165, as I never have. My thoughts are as follows: I have a lean 7 wrist and prefer smaller watches, so I feel the 5165 could be the perfect size for me. I've tried the 5167, however, and I can say it felt too big. From an investment standpoint, I feel that the rarity of the 5165 and the fact that it had a short production run, and the fact that it has an integrated bracelet & the same quality dial as the 5167 might make it a winner in the long term.So, can anyone comment on whether the 5165 feels too small? Are the dials as vibrant and dynamic under different lighting as the 5167? Do 5165 owners love their watch, or do they wish they had the 5167? Do any 5167 owners feel their watch could be a bit smaller? Finally,
Panerai enroute to me from a trade.
I recently made a trade for a Panerai 244 that is like new and virtually unworn in it's original box with everything. Has the golden brown oem croc strap and deployant buckle. This is a 2009 and I was very pleased to get it, especially considering it's condition. I know lots of people prefer the larger Panerai's and look down on the 40mm's but I'm not one of them. Especially considering my daily wear tool watch is a Rolex SD40. Should be here Friday and I am anxious.Photos are courtesy of the person I obtained the watch from.
Change my mind
If you are wearing a yellow gold Rolex president, other fashion rules do not apply to you.Change my mindJust looking for a fun debate
[Rating:(5 / 5 stars)]
